Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disco Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Disco Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album that does not have any significant third-party coverage at this time. ArcAngel (talk) 10:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This albums wikipedia page should not be removed because the artist music is very popular and people would like to know more about this artist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Croniclataus (talk • contribs) 11:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have independent third-party sources that say otherwise? ArcAngel (talk) 11:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Per my entry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go U Good Thing about article related to the same singer. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- comment the album is on itunes and amazon mp3 and many more i can say and it should stay in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Croniclataus (talk • contribs) 11:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This merely indicates that the album is for sale, which is not the same as being notable. Favonian (talk) 11:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- http://www.popjustice.com/forum/index.php?topic=16349.120 - look at this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Croniclataus (talk • contribs) 11:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can find no WP:RS to suggest this meets WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 22:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.